Les isotopes cosmogéniques 3He et 10Be dans les minéraux mafiques

Les isotopes cosmogéniques 3He et Be dans les
minéraux mafiques

Samples

Calibration of TCN production rates requires analysis of natural surfaces which (i) can be independently dated with precision, (ii) have suffered negligible erosion, and (iii) have not been buried in anyway since the start of their exposure. Basaltic flows may be considered as ideal objects for such calibrations as their ropy flow surfaces can be used as a qualitative check of the “negligible erosion” condition, and also because they are often suited for radiometric dating by K-Ar or 14C on entrained organic material. 2.1.1 Etna volcano samples Mount Etna volcano (Sicily, 38°N) has produced large alkali trachybasalt eruptions since ~200 ka. These flows are well-suited for cosmogenic 3 He calibrations because their ropy surfaces have been affected by only minor erosion in many places, even after several kyr of exposure. Moreover, the K content (~2%) of these basalts makes them appropriate for K-Ar dating (Gillot et al., 1994). The samples considered here have already been described in another study designed to test a paleoaltimetric method based on TCN production (Blard et al., 2005). The two (re)analyzed lava surfaces, SI41 and SI47 (Table III.1) belong respectively to the Nave flow, 33±2 ka, and the Simeto terrace flow, 41±3 ka (Blard et al., 2005).

Mauna Loa and Mauna

Kea (Hawaii) samples Mauna Loa (4170 m) and Mauna Kea (4206 m) are the two highest shield volcanoes of the Hawaii Island (20°N) (Fig. III.1). Mauna Kea is mainly built by tholeiitic basalts which are overlain by later alkali basalts. Several Pleistocene flow surfaces have been exposed and preserved of any burial during several kyr since the main eruptive activity of this volcano stopped at ~50 ka. Located in the dry region of Waimea (Fig. III.1), the MK4 surface (830 m) (Table III.1) was collected on a ropy alkali basalt flow which has been K-Ar dated at 149±23 ka (Wolfe et al., 1997). The annual rainfall being very low (< 450 mm.yr-1) on the western side of Big Island, this flow is likely to have suffered very limited erosion since its emplacement, as suggested by the remarkable ropy surface preservation (Fig. III.2). Moreover, no clue of thick ash covering has been observed, even in the depressions. On the other hand, Mauna Loa volcano still presents an intense eruptive activity. Consequently, more than 95% of the volcano flanks above 1000 m are covered by historical lavas (< 6 ka). Because of the low K content (< 1%) of these young tholeiitic basalts, K-Ar dating cannot provide the precision required for TCN production rates calibration. The sampled surfaces have thus been selected on young flows independently dated by 14C. Fig. III.1. Satellite image (Spot) of Big Island (Hawaii) and samples locations ML1A, B, C MK4 Altitudinal section ML5A ML10 to ML14 20 km MAUNA KEA MAUNA LOA N 20° N 19° W 156° W 155°  Before measurement by Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, the charcoal samples have been pretreated to eliminate contamination (Trusdell). The 14C dates have then been adjusted using the calibration curve of Reimer et al. (Reimer et al., 2004). To limit the risk of potential flow confusion, the surfaces studied here have been sampled close to the location of the 14C dating sites. Fig. III.2. Photos of several sampled ropy flow surfaces (ML1A, ML10, MK4) Two Mauna Loa flows presenting all the requirements for accurate calibration were sampled (Fig. III.1 and Table III.1): – Kaunamano flow, 14C age cal. 8230±80 yr BP, pahoehoe features, ~25% of 1-2 mm olivine phenocrysts, close to sea level. On this flow, three samples (ML1A, ML1B, ML1C) were collected within an area of 1km², in order to reproduce measurements from a single well documented surface. – Kapapala flow, 14C age cal. 1470±50 yr BP, pahoehoe features, ~10% of 0.5-1 mm olivine phenocrysts. The analyzed sample, ML5A, was collected at 870 m elevation. The uncertainties associated with these 14C ages are only analytical, and thus only partially reflect the absolute accuracy of the flow ages. However, the robustness of these individual 14C flow ages is supported by bracketing provided by independent 14C dating of underlying and overlying lavas (Trusdell). Finally, another study by (Gayer et al., 2004) revealed an unexpected overproduction of cosmogenic helium in garnets at high elevations (> 3000 m). Analysis of olivines exposed at high elevation is one way to assess if this 3 Hec excess is specific to garnets. The 3 Hec production systematic is indeed more documented for this mineral. Consequently, an  altitudinal section (samples ML10 ML12A,B, ML13, ML14A,B) has been collected following the same single flow ropy surface from 4000 to 2400 m (Fig. III.1 and Table III.1). The continuity of this flow is not clear below 2000 m, where the tropical forest covers the lava. The 14C dates available in this area thus cannot be considered as robust to date the upper part (< 2000 m) of the flow. Nevertheless, inaccurate dating of this flow is not a drawback as the goal of this sampling was to derive an empirical atmospheric attenuation length for 3 Hec in olivines.

Table des matières

CHAPITRE I – INTRODUCTION : LES ISOTOPES COSMOGENIQUES EN GEOMORPHOLOGIE – PROBLEMATIQUE
1 PREAMBULE
2 RAYONNEMENT COSMIQUE ET PRODUCTION DES COSMONUCLEIDES
2.1 LES RAYONNEMENTS COSMIQUES PRIMAIRE ET SECONDAIRE
2.1.1 Influence du champ magnétique terrestre
2.1.2 Influence de l’atmosphère – cascade réactionnelle et atténuation
2.2 FACTEURS DE CORRECTION GEOGRAPHIQUE
3 LES ISOTOPES COSMOGENIQUES DANS LES ECHANTILLONS GEOLOGIQUES – SYSTEMES ETABLIS
4 EQUATIONS DE PRODUCTION – APPLICATIONS GEOMORPHOLOGIQUES
5 PROBLEMATIQUES ABORDEES – PLAN DE L’ETUDE
CHAPITRE II – METHODES ANALYTIQUES
1 ECHANTILLONNAGE ET EXTRACTION DES PHASES ANALYSEES
1.1 CHOIX DU SYSTEME « MINERAL – ISOTOPE COSMOGENIQUE »
1.2 STRATEGIE D’ECHANTILLONNAGE
1.3 EXTRACTION DES MINERAUX
1.3.1 Broyage
1.3.2 Tamisage
1.3.3 Séparation magnétique préliminaire.
1.3.4 Liqueurs denses.
1.3.5 Séparation magnétique fine au Frantz
1.3.6 Tri manuel
2 ANALYSE DU  HE COSMOGENIQUE
2.1 CARACTERISTIQUES GEOCHIMIQUES DE L’HELIUM
2.2 EXTRACTION, PURIFICATION ET ANALYSE DE L’HELIUM PAR SPECTROMETRIE DE MASSE GAZ RARES
2.2.1 Extraction du gaz magmatique par broyage in vacuo6
2.2.2 Extraction du gaz magmatique par fusion in vacuo dans un four HT
2.2.3 Ligne de purification
2.2.4 Analyse isotopique et élémentaire au spectromètre de masse VG5400
2.2.5 Détermination de la sensibilité du spectromètre de masse
2.2.6 Calcul de l’abondance
2.2.7 Détermination des incertitudes analytiques
2.3 LE CALCUL DU HE COSMOGENIQUE FACE A LA DIVERSITE DES CAS NATURELS
2.3.1 Influence de la contribution de  He magmatique sur la précision de la détermination de  He cosmogénique
2.3.2 Méthodes de correction de la composante de
He* radiogénique
2.3.3 Méthodes par isochrones cosmogéniques
3 ANALYSE DU BE COSMOGENIQUE DANS LES OLIVINES ET LES PYROXENES
CHAPITRE III – MISE EN EVIDENCE DE LA PERTE D’HELIUM COSMOGENIQUE PAR BROYAGE DES PHENOCRISTAUX
RECALIBRATION DES TAUX DE PRODUCTION DE  HEC
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MATERIAL AND METHODS
2.1 SAMPLES
2.1.1 Etna volcano samples
2.1.2 Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea (Hawaii) samples6
2.2 COSMOGENIC
HE MEASUREMENT – TESTS PERFORMED TO ASSESS  HEC LOSS FROM THE FINE FRACTION
3 RESULTS
3.1 MAGMATIC RATIO FOR MAUNA KEA AND MAUNA LOA FLOWS
3.2 GRANULOMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF THE POWDERED FRACTION
3.3 EVIDENCE OF COSMOGENIC
HE LOSS DURING THE CRUSHING-STEP
4 DISCUSSION
4.1 MECHANISMS INVOLVED IN THE
HEC RELEASE
4.2 COMMENTS ON FUTURE PRACTICE
4.3 REVISED ESTIMATE OF SLHL P3
4.3.1 Calculation
4.3.2 Results
4.4 EMPIRICAL ATMOSPHERIC ATTENUATION LENGTH ESTIMATE (FROM 2400 TO 4000 M)6
5 CONCLUSIONS
CHAPITRE IV – MESURE DU BEC IN SITU DANS LES PHENOCRISTAUX MAPHIQUES: DECONTAMINATION METEORIQUE ET CALIBRATION DES TAUX DE PRODUCTION
1 INTRODUCTION
2 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND SAMPLES
2.1 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
2.2 LAVA FLOWS AGES
3 METHODS
3.1 MINERALS EXTRACTION
3.2 BE DECONTAMINATION
3.3 CLEANING PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION
4 RESULTS
5 DISCUSSION
5.1 CALCULATION OF BE PRODUCTION RATES
5.2 COMPARISON WITH SIMULATED PRODUCTION RATES
6 CONCLUSION
CHAPITRE V – CHRONOLOGIE DU DERNIER RETRAIT GLACIAIRE DU MAUNA KEA (HAWAII, PACIFIQUE CENTRAL) ETABLIE PAR DATATION
HE COSMOGENIQUE
IMPLICATIONS PALEOCLIMATIQUES POUR LE PACIFIQUE CENTRAL
1 INTRODUCTION
2 GEOLOGICAL AND GEOMORPHIC SETTINGS – METHODS
2.1 SAMPLING
2.2 COSMOGENIC
HE MEASUREMENT
3 COSMOGENIC
HE RESULTS – GLACIAL CHRONOLOGY
4 DISCUSSION – PALEOCLIMATIC IMPLICATIONS
CHAPITRE VI – APPLICATIONS DES EXPOSITIONS ANCIENNES : THEORIE, TECHNIQUES ET LIMITES
1 INTRODUCTION
2 THEORETICAL BASIS
2.1 FOSSIL EXPOSED SURFACES (CASES 1, 2 AND 3)
2.1.1 Definitions
2.1.2 Potential applications
2.2 FORMATIONS BEARING INHERITED TCN (CASES 4 AND 5)
2.2.1 Definitions
2.2.2 Potential applications
3 EXAMPLES OF APPLICATIONS
3.1 APPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL EXPOSED SURFACES
3.1.1 Testing the paleoaltimetry method (case 1) on fossil exposed basalts of Mount Etna (Blard et al., 2005)
3.1.2 Measuring local paleoerosion rates (case 2) using the fossil exposed surface of Fish Canyon Tuff
(Libarkin et al., 2002)
3.2 APPLICATIONS OF FORMATIONS BEARING INHERITED TCN – MEASURING PALEOEROSION RATES OF A WHOLE CATCHMENT (CASE 4) (SCHALLER ET AL., 2002)
4 DISCUSSION – GEOLOGICAL AND ANALYTICAL LIMITATIONS
4.1 GEOLOGICAL CONSTRAINS – AVAILABILITY OF SUITED GEOLOGICAL TARGETS
4.2 DETECTION LIMITS AND UNCERTAINTIES
4.2.1 Paleoaltimetry (case 1)
4.2.2 Paleoeorion rates
4.2.3 Lava emission rates (case 3)
5 CONCLUSION
CHAPITRE VII –
HE COSMOGENIQUE FOSSILE DANS DES COULEES
BASALTIQUES DU MONT ETNA (SICILE, 38°N) DATEES PAR K-AR :EVALUATION D’UN NOUVEAU PALEOALTIMETRE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 METHODS
2.1 PALEOALTIMETER THEORETICAL BASIS
2.2 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
2.3 K-AR DATING
2.4 COSMOGENIC
HE MEASUREMENT
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 K-AR AGES
3.2 COSMOGENIC
HE RESULTS
3.3 ALTITUDE CALCULATION
3.3.1 Production rate to altitude conversion
3.3.2 Altitudes inferred from unshielded samples
3.3.3 Altitudes inferred from couples of superimposed lava flows
4 RESOLUTION OF THE PROPOSED PALEOALTIMETER
5 CONCLUSION

projet fin d'etudeTélécharger le document complet

Télécharger aussi :

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *